Why You Won't Find Client Case Studies Here
If we won't show your pentest findings to the next prospect, we shouldn't show theirs to you. Here is what we share instead, and how to verify us anyway.
The three reasons
A case study with real names + real findings is short-term marketing and long-term liability for the client. We pass.
Findings are attack blueprints.
A case study that names the client and lists what we found tells the next attacker exactly where to look. The shorter the time since the test, the more useful it is to them. We do not publish that.
NDAs are not paperwork.
Every engagement signs a mutual NDA. Honoring it means respecting both the letter and the spirit, not finding the loophole that lets us turn a client into a marketing asset.
Your reputation is the buyer's question.
Prospects ask: does this firm protect our data? Publishing past clients' breaches answers that question the wrong way. We treat every client like the one whose name we will not be discussing on a sales call next quarter.
Four things that let you evaluate us without violating anyone's confidence
Sample reports, full format.
Real methodology, real structure, real findings categories. Just anonymized. You see what the actual deliverable looks like before signing anything.
Logos, with written consent.
A small set of clients have signed off on logo display. They are on the homepage. We do not list anyone who has not given written approval.
Testimonials, anonymized by default.
Founders and CTOs share their experience on the homepage. Most go by role + first name. Some allow full attribution. All are real, all are quoted with their permission.
References, on request.
Serious prospects can talk to past clients direct. We coordinate the intro after you sign a mutual NDA, and only with clients who have agreed to be referenced. No cold lists, no scripted calls.
Confidentiality is the constraint. Trust still has to be earned.
Founder-led calls.
You talk to Ashok and Rathnakara. Not an SDR, not a junior account manager. The people who run the engagement run the sales conversation.
Public methodology.
The /methodology/ page documents how we test, what frameworks we follow (OWASP WSTG v5.0, OWASP API Top 10 2026, OWASP MASVS, OWASP IoT Top 10), and what a typical engagement covers.
Certifications, attributable.
OSCP, CompTIA PenTest+, M.Sc Cyber Security are held by Rathnakara, our CHO and lead pen tester. Verifiable through OffSec and CompTIA public credential portals.
Ready to evaluate us properly?
Read the sample report front to back. If it feels like the kind of work you want done on your stack, book a 30-minute call with Ashok or Rathnakara. We will tell you on the call whether the engagement fits, even if it means saying no.